Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 18:12

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
See ‘Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’ Season 3 Episode Titles And New Posters - TrekMovie.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Odit dolor officiis cupiditate doloribus repellendus culpa ullam.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What a list actors/ actresses are notorious for being jerks in real life?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What are some important works of Marcel Proust (novelist)?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 races to record sales, driven by Mario Kart World's blockbuster debut - ABC News
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Fans slam Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford's message to "cost sensitive" fans - Eurogamer
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.